January 16th, 1995
Sandy Hook's superintendent...
seven years of misinformation...
misleading comments about...Highlands-Sea Bright drawbridge
Park Service misleads on fort project, bridge plan
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 01/16/07
In an era tolerant of political "spin," I'm still old fashioned.
I believe in individual responsibility. If you obfuscate or hide information from taxpayers, that's on you.
Accordingly, I must criticize Richard Wells, Sandy Hook's superintendent, not only for seven years of misinformation about the National Park Service's plan to allow commercial businesses in Fort Hancock, but also for his misleading comments about why he favors replacing the Highlands-Sea Bright drawbridge.
First, the Park Service has not distinguished itself with its honesty. In 2001, it jolted many citizens by announcing it would lease 36 Fort Hancock buildings for commercial use to an inexperienced, one-man local real estate company, Wassel Realty, for 60 years.
Hoping to blunt public outcries about permitting businesses in a national park, it claimed the plan had been discussed at public hearings 25 years earlier.
No one at that time discussed privatizing and commercializing one-third to half of what was then described to be "Fort Hancock Village."
The Park Service also declared Wassel Realty a "prestigious firm" with "the best plan."
However, the speculator never handled such a project before and lacked the required financial backing — a detail an embarrassed Park Service still ignores.
Wells and the speculator, James Wassel, took pains to deny their commercial profit center would affect the environment or recreational access.
They sanctimoniously chimed: "We wouldn't think of encouraging commercial tenants to hold events on busy summer weekends."
All not true, since the Park Service plan includes bed and breakfast places, bars, restaurants, office buildings, conference centers and "corporate educational facilities" — all businesses that not only will operate on weekends but will reduce beach access.
The Park Service in 2004 announced it had a "contract" with Wassel, hoping a fait accompli would deflect growing public opposition to its privatization and commercialization plan.
But surprise! Regional Park Service officials later admitted no contract existed, only an "agreement to agree."
Wassel in October 2004 claimed that because the fort is a National Historic Landmark District, "the Park Service cannot allow these treasures to fall down."
First, the Park Service has been allowing just that for 30 years.
Second, no statutory obligation to rehabilitate exists. It's a Park Service fiction to justify privatizing the fort.
Wassel also wrote that he and the Park Service "have worked out a winterization plan for the buildings to immediately protect them from the "further ravages' of Mother Nature."
However, nothing has been done. Lacking funding, Wassel has no contract.
Legally, he can't change a light bulb.
Which now brings us to Wells.
He recently sidestepped historical considerations to support the proposed new $137 million fixed-span bridge.
"I urge you to look at impacts on the broader human environment and not simply through the narrow lens of the effect on a historic property," he wrote the state Department of Transportation.
Wells is not being forthright.
The "human environment" he really cares about is Wassel's potential customers — the ones they both promised wouldn't be showing up to take away beach parking on peak summer days.
Since the drawbridge blocks Route 36 — and Sandy Hook — when it opens for boat traffic twice an hour, it also will block Wassel's customers.
Wells, who needs that new bridge for his tenants, hoped we taxpayers couldn't put two and two together.
We citizens deserve better from those entrusted to protect our natural and cultural resources.
Perhaps Congress will finally wake up.
Judith Stanley Coleman
MIDDLETOWN
http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Date=20070116&Category=OPINION&ArtNo=701160316&SectionCat=&Template=printart
Copyright © 2007 Asbury Park Press. All rights reserved.
November 13th, 2008
Save Sandy Hook will continue to figh...
...commercialization was never envisioned by the founders of the National Park Service
October 21st, 2008
BREAKING NEWS..Pallone..end Ft. Hanco...
Pallone urges park service to end Ft. Hancock lease Wants state, local officials and nonprofits to create plan
October 5th, 2008
BREAKING NEWS - End extensions
Save Sandy Hook's right to file an appeal...late December...why has the National Park Service given six deadline extensions....
July 6th, 2008
BREAKING NEWS court date is scheduled...
National Park Service's ...sixth extension to Sandy Hook Partners... defies comprehension.
February 29th, 2008
BREAKING NEWS Battle Over Sandy Hook ...
Save Sandy Hook files appeal of federal judge ruling
September 18th, 2007
Opponents of Fort Hancock redevelopme...
Save Sandy Hook...proposal overly commercial for Fort Hancock
September 7th, 2007
BREAKING NEWS
SAVE SANDY HOOK SAVE OUR BRIDGE FUND RAISER SEPTEMBER 23,2007
July 30th, 2007
PRESS RELEASE-U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone...
"this investigation will shed some light on why the agreement was signed in the first place"
July 13th, 2007
BREAKING NEWS-Save Sandy Hook Files M...
Developer must wait until lawsuit is settled, opponents state
June 30th, 2007
BREAKING NEWS
ASBURY PARK PRESS...time for Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J.,to demand a federal investigation.
January 16th, 2007
Park Service misleads on fort project...
Sandy Hook's superintendent... seven years of misinformation... misleading comments...Highlands-Sea Bright drawbridge.
December 5th, 2006
BREAKING NEWS
Claim lease deal violates U.S. law,National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Park Service Organic Act
September 24th, 2006
BREAKING NEWS
Mary A. Bomar, who has been nominated to head the National Park Service.... before she is confirmed...it's time for Bomar and the park service to ...
September 6th, 2006
National Park Service that has lost i...
Save Sandy Hook ...fundraiser at my Middletown home Sept.10 ...opposing... privatization commercialization plan.
August 15th, 2006
BREAKING NEWS
a fund raiser to help SAVE SANDY HOOK "JAZZ ON THE NAVESINK" featuring Leif Arntzen & Company SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2006 ...
August 12th, 2006
Interested in saving Sandy Hook ?
To help Save Sandy Hook and/or for more information, please send an email to SHSBULLETIN@aol.com or CJDiBalm@aol.com OR write to SAVE S...
August 11th, 2006
GET INVOLVED
CONTACT US AT SAVE SANDY HOOK P O BOX 7547 SHREWSBURY, NJ 07702-7547
December 2nd, 2005
BREAKING NEWS
I'm pretty sure Congress never envisioned a day when we would be privatizing national parks," when it set up the guidelines that allowed for this p...
October 17th, 2005
press releases
SAVE SANDY HOOK AND CLEARWATER ATTACK GOVERNMENT FLIP-FLOP
October 11th, 2005
PRESS RELEASE
SAVE SANDY HOOK AND CLEARWATER ATTACK GOVERNMENT FLIP-FLOP
August 18th, 2005
press release
CLEARWATER TO JOIN SUIT TO BLOCK DEVELOPMENT ON SANDY HOOK Environmental group will ask court to allow it to join other plaintiffs
July 7th, 2005
TIME TO SCRAP BOGUS PARK PLAN
July 7, 2005 ASBURY PARK PRESS EDITORIAL "the plan runs counter to the park service's mission to preserve the natural environment ...
July 6th, 2005
Developer gets new extension to secur...
Paul P. Josephson, an attorney for Save Sandy Hook, expressed disapproval that this makes a seventh extension granted to the developer
July 3rd, 2005
Project's problems reason for denial
If this application went before a local planning board, it would undoubtedly be turned down for insufficient data.
July 1st, 2005
TOPIC OF THE DAY
KEEP PARKLAND FOR PUBLIC USE The unique value of Sandy Hook lies in the spectacular land itself.
September 20th, 2004
Save Sandy Hook to File Suit - The Fi...
I will file a civil action on behalf of Save Sandy Hook in federal District Court seeking an injunction to block work on the redevelopment project ...
September 18th, 2004
National Park Service: Public Forum 2...
National Park Service representatives will attend a forum Saturday 18th September to disuss plans for the redevelopment of Fort Hancock at Sandy Ho...
August 13th, 2004
Save Sandy Hook will Sue NPS Over Lease
Save Sandy Hook (SSH) put the National Park Service on notice last week that it will bring suit in federal court to challenge a lease for historic ...
July 15th, 2004
Pallone to Meet with Save Sandy Hook,...
Pallone is scheduled to meet with members of Save Sandy Hook, a grassroots organization that was formed to oppose the development and any commercia...
May 31st, 2004
Funding issues and changing ground ru...
The developer, The Wassel Realty Group, must show proof of funding for the entire amount of the project by June 30, 2004. PETITION DRIVE at San...
May 13th, 2004
Save Sandy Hook fundraiser a success.
To all those that attended, donated to and worked so hard to make Save Sandy Hook's May 1, 2004 first Fundraiser a very successful event, the Board...
March 17th, 2004
Borough of Highlands Resolution
RESOLUTION PASSED: March 17, 2004 Borough of Highlands, NJ resolution opposing the National Park Service Plan to lease Fort Hancock, Sandy Hoo...
February 23rd, 2004
Holmdel Township Resolution
RESOLUTION PASSED: February 23, 2004 Holmdel Township, NJ resolution opposing the National Park Service Plan to lease Fort Hancock, Sandy Hook f...
October 25th, 2003
Save Sandy Hook Group Elects Officers...
The citizens' organization Save Sandy Hook held its first annual meeting this week, and reelected Mrs. Judith Stanley Coleman of Middletown as chai...
October 15th, 2002
Save Sandy Hook group outlines goals ...
The citizens' organization that recently formed to oppose the proposed commercialization of Fort Monmouth at Sandy Hook announced today that it is ...
January 16th, 1995
PRESS RELEASE
Park Service misleads on fort project, bridge plan
If you have a press release or article that is not part of the archive that you feel should be, please email a copy to info@savesandyhook.org and we will endevaour to include it. Thanks